Skip to main content

Decoding the Enigma: Why Mason Remey Signed the Document

 

The Haifa Baha’is point out that Mason Remey was one of the 26 hands present at the conclave who signed the document that no guardian could have been appointed. In this article, we aim to shed light on the reasons behind Remey's decision to sign the document. We'll explore the principle of collective action in the Baha'i Faith and Remey's commitment to maintaining unity, even when he had inner disagreements.

Brent Mathieu mentions: 

An explanation of Remey’s signature on the document, despite his belief in the necessity of a living Guardian, is that the established Baba’i principle in collective action is that once an assembly reaches a majority decision, all dissenters cease opposition, and accept the decision to maintain unity, even if they believe it in error. Baha’is trust God that eventually the truth will be revealed, and error corrected. 

(Mathieu, “Biography of Charles Mason Remey,” on the Heart of the Baha’i Faith forum, December 28, 2004.)


Mathieu is apparently correct since Remey, in commenting on the documents signed “Faithfully Yours in the Service of the Beloved Guardian,” remarks.


Remey himself mentions:

When I have objected to this statement that I am obliged because of the majority policy of the Cause to place my signature to (despite the fact that I amt opposed to so doing), I am told that the beloved Guardian planned out this Ten-Year Crusade and that is that ... ”

(“Extracts from the Daily Observations,” p. 38).


Remey mentions his “support” for “whatever the majority stand for” in the following comments, although he expresses his inner disagreement:

I support them — the nobles of the Faith — in whatever the majority stand for, thus I am supporting the face they make before the people, while in my inner thoughts I know that they are on the wrong track entirely and are leading the Faith to destruction.

(“Extracts from the Daily Observations,” p. 68)


Daily I am obliged to sign my name to many letters and communications going out from Haifa to all quarters of the Baha’i World thus endorsing the majority action and thought of the Custodian Hands in the Holy Land. All of this is, of course, most repugnant to me personally....”

(“Extracts from the Daily Observations,” p. 76)


Although Remey is following the agreed-upon Baha’i policy in collective action, the fact is Remey did sign these documents, which the hands later (after Remey’s Proclamation) were very quick to point out that he had signed.


To conclude, Mason Remey's decision to sign the document denying the appointment of a guardian, despite his inner disagreements, reflects his dedication to the Baha'i principle of collective action and the importance of maintaining unity within the community. While his signature on these documents may have been a point of contention, it's essential to understand his actions within the broader context of Baha'i principles and his commitment to the faith's unity.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Rúhíyyih Khánum and the Guardianship in the Bahá'í Faith: Unity, Controversy, and Schisms

  The institution of the Guardianship holds a significant place within the Bahá'í Faith, as it was established by 'Abdu'l-Bahá in His Will and Testament to ensure the unity and continuity of the religion founded by Bahá'u'lláh. According to 'Abdu'l-Bahá, the Guardian of the Cause of God is the "sacred head and the distinguished member for life" of the Universal House of Justice, which serves as the supreme legislative body of the Bahá'í world. The Guardian is entrusted with the authority to interpret the writings of Bahá'u'lláh and 'Abdu'l-Bahá, as well as the appointment of the Hands of the Cause of God, who assist him in his work.   The first Guardian of the Bahá'í Faith was Shoghi Effendi, appointed by 'Abdu'l-Bahá in His Will as His "branch" and "the sign of God." From 1921 until his passing in 1957, Shoghi Effendi guided the development and expansion of the Bahá'í community. His not...

Guardianship or 'Badah'? Investigating the Mason Remey Claim and the Hands of the Cause Decision

  The International Baha’i Council (IBC) was an administrative body established by Shoghi Effendi, the first Guardian of the Baha’i Faith, in 1951. It was intended to be an "embryonic" Universal House of Justice, the supreme institution of the Baha’i Faith. Shoghi Effendi appointed Charles Mason Remey as the president of the IBC and gave him a prominent role in the development of the Baha’i World Centre in Haifa, Israel.   Remey was a prominent American Baha’i who had been a close associate of 'Abdu’l-Baha, the son of Baha’u’llah, the founder of the Baha’i Faith. 'Abdu’l-Baha had praised Remey as "my dear son" and had prophesied that he would be "a sign of guidance unto mankind". Remey was also considered to be an adopted Aghsan (Branch), a term used for the male descendants of Baha’u’llah.   According to the Will and Testament of 'Abdu’l-Baha, which established the Guardianship as a hereditary institution, the Guardian had to appoint h...

Who Are Covenant Breakers in the Bahá'í Faith? Exploring the Concept and its Significance

  First, let us understand what a covenant is:   In the Bahá'í Faith, the term "Covenant" refers to the agreement or contract between God and humanity. The Bahá'í Covenant establishes a relationship between God and humanity that is founded on the recognition of Bahá'u'lláh as the Manifestation of God for this age, and the acceptance of His teachings as the source of guidance for humanity.   The Bahá'í Covenant is seen as a vital and unifying force that protects the integrity of the religion and ensures the continuation of its spiritual and social progress. The Covenant includes the concept of succession, which means that after the passing of Bahá'u'lláh, the leadership of the Bahá'í community was passed on to His appointed successor, `Abdu'l-Bahá, and after him to a line of individuals known as the Guardians of the Bahá'í Faith. According to mainstream Baha'is, the Guardianship ended upon the passing away of Shoghi Effendi, ...